Notable Case
Ephedrine abuse causing acute myocardial infarction
Jerome G L Cockings and Michael A Brown
"On the street", the more expensive illegal psychostimulants, such
as cocaine or amphetamine, may be mixed with or substituted for
cheaper drugs such as ephedrine -- with added risk to the user. We
report diffuse myocardial injury in a 25-year-old man who presented
with pulmonary oedema after intravenously injecting himself with
ephedrine, believing it to be amphetamine.
MJA 1997; 167: 199-200
Introduction -
Clinical record -
Discussion -
References -
Authors' details
Make a
comment -
Register to be notified of new articles by e-mail -
Current contents list -
Articles on similar material
| Introduction |
The abuse of psychostimulants, such as cocaine and amphetamines, is
of concern in Australia -- they are among the most widely used of the
illicit drugs after cannabis.1 Occupational use of
stimulant drugs is also a problem -- there have been accidents
involving heavy transport vehicles whose drivers had taken
ephedrine.2 In addition, ephedrine may
be taken by "recreational" drug abusers when it is mixed with or
substituted for other illicit drugs such as amphetamines.
Ephedrine has both cardiovascular and central nervous system
effects, but, although the cardiovascular risks of major
psychostimulants such as cocaine are well known,3 little has been
reported for ephedrine. We report a patient who injected himself
intravenously with ephedrine, sustaining diffuse myocardial
injury which resolved with inotropic support and ventilation.
|
|
Clinical record |
A 25-year-old man with a history of intravenous psychostimulant
abuse presented to hospital with progressive dyspnoea two hours
after injecting himself intravenously with a solution of a white
powder he believed was amphetamine. He had no other medical history of
note, was a non-smoker and had previously been well. There was no
family history of sudden cardiac death. Serum lipid levels were not
measured.
On examination he was conscious but tachypnoeic and cyanosed. He was
afebrile, tachycardic (pulse, 140 beats/min), normotensive
(110/70 mmHg) and hypoxic (Pao2, 49 mmHg), with
hypocapnia (Paco2, 33 mmHg), a mild alkalosis (pH, 7.45)
and a pronounced leukocytosis (44 x 106 cells/L). He had a reduced
cardiac output (2.2 L/min; normal range, 4.5-6.5 L/min), with a pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (an estimate of left
atrial pressure) of 30 mmHg. There was bilateral "bat's wing"
opacification on chest x-ray, consistent with a clinical diagnosis
of pulmonary oedema.
Within an hour of admission and treatment with diuretic and oxygen,
further deterioration with cardiogenic shock necessitated
intubation, ventilation and admission to an intensive care unit.
Initially, the lungs were poorly compliant (49
mL/cmH2O; normal range, 70-100 mL/cmH2O)
and the alveolar-arterial (A-a) O2 gradient was
elevated (260 mmHg; normal range, < 50 mmHg when on 80%
O2). He received continuous inotropic support with
adrenaline, initially at 38 µg/min, which was steadily
reduced over three days. By Day 3, his cardiac output was 5.5 L/min
without inotropes. His respiratory function and gas exchange
improved steadily and he was extubated on Day 5.
Results of microbiological investigations (tracheal aspirate,
blood culture and urine culture) were negative and
antibiotics were not given.
On admission, electrocardiograms revealed widespread
ST-segment depression with T-wave inversion, consistent with
subendocardial infarction and ischaemia. A posterior infarction
could not be excluded. The peak serum creatine kinase (CK) level was
2360 U/L (normal range, 20-130 U/L) (CK-MB isozyme fraction, 6.1%;
normally < 2%), with rises in serum levels of aspartate
aminotransferase (to 222 U/L [normal range, < 45 U/L]) and lactate
dehydrogenase (to 612 U/L [normal range, 110-230 U/L]). A technetium
Tc 99m perfusion scan of the myocardium showed mild tracer uptake in
the left myocardium and more intense uptake in the posterolateral
wall, consistent with diffuse myocardial damage and an acute
posterolateral infarction.
Echocardiography soon after admission showed severe left
ventricular dysfunction in all areas except the apex (which showed
near-normal contractility), with a poor overall ejection fraction.
There was mild mitral regurgitation with no vegetations. Right
ventricular function was normal. On Day 6, mild to moderate
impairment of left ventricular function was still present, maximum
at the base, with mild ventricular dilatation.
The patient continued to improve and was discharged from hospital
nine days after admission.
Laboratory analysis of the unused white powder identified only
ephedrine.
On review one month later the patient was symptom-free. The resting
electrocardiogram showed non-specific ST-segment and T-wave
changes. Exercise testing, carried out according to the Bruce
protocol,4 was 13.5 min in duration and
limited by fatigue. His peak heart rate was 192 beats/min, with no
chest pain or ST-segment or T-wave changes. He attained an estimated
oxygen consumption of 49 mL/kg per min (normal range, 50-70 mL/kg per
min) and an aerobic capacity of 106% of the predicted value.
At two months, echocardiography showed normal left ventricular
function but persistent trivial mitral regurgitation with a minor
prolapse of the anterior leaflet. The patient was counselled
about the health risks (such as the risk of bacterial endocarditis) of
continuing to inject illegally obtained drugs.
|
|
Discussion |
Our patient presented with diffuse myocardial injury consistent
with sympathomimetic abuse -- the agent was identified as ephedrine.
He recovered adequately after intensive treatment.
The stimulatory central nervous system effects of ephedrine --
increased arousal, restlessness and insomnia -- have been
recognised for many years. Preparations of the herb ephedra were used
in ancient Chinese medicines, and ephedrine, the active alkaloid,
was identified in the late 19th century.5 Ephedrine is a direct
agonist of both alpha and beta sympathetic receptors and an indirect
adrenoreceptor agonist, causing release of noradrenaline from
presynaptic sympathetic nerve terminals. Its cardiovascular
effects include tachycardia, increased inotropy, arterial
vasoconstriction and hypertension,6 and these are the effects for
which it is used therapeutically. Amphetamine and pseudoephedrine
have similar actions, although amphetamine has more pronounced
central nervous system effects.7
Ephedrine is widely available, but despite the potential for abuse
that this creates there are few reports of its cardiovascular risks.
Bruno et al. described two cases of intracranial haemorrhage and one
of a thalamic infarct following excessive ephedrine
ingestion,6 highlighting the potential
dangers of non-prescribed self-administration of this drug.
Chronic cardiomyopathy was documented after long-term ingestion of
ephedrine in a cough mixture.8 Myocardial injury occurred
after ephedrine given therapeutically for hypotension during
labour,9 and coronary artery spasm
leading to myocardial injury has been described with
pseudoephedrine ingestion.10
The mechanism of the myocardial injury caused by ephedrine overdose
is probably similar to that caused by cocaine -- intense diffuse
vasoconstriction of both the coronary and the systemic arterial
systems, decreasing myocardial perfusion, increasing afterload,
and increasing myocardial oxygen utilisation.3 Although severe
hypertension would be expected with ephedrine overdose, and may have
been present in our patient soon after the injection of ephedrine, on
presentation he had severe acute left ventricular failure with a
consequent fall in contractility and blood pressure. This
necessitated inotropic support rather than the use of vasodilators.
Various other factors may have contributed to the myocardial injury
in our patient. There may have been contaminants in the syringe, and
the injection of insoluble particulate matter may have caused
vascular occlusion. This could have been compounded by
catecholamine-enhanced platelet aggregation induced by
ephedrine. Further, although no other agents were identified in the
remaining unused powder, the original injection may have included
another myotoxin. Pre-existing coronary artery disease was
unlikely in an otherwise healthy young non-smoker. A coronary
angiogram was not performed. Although the leukocytosis was
pronounced, this was consistent with the severe physiological
stress.
Nevertheless, in the absence of any other antecedent events or prior
myocardial disease, this case report strongly suggests that the
acute myocardial infarction was precipitated by the self-injection
of ephedrine. "On the street", small quantities of a cheaper drug such
as ephedrine may be mixed with stimulants such as amphetamine. This
case illustrates the risks associated with the total substitution of
ephedrine and the subsequent injection of what is likely to have been a
high dose of this drug.
|
|
References |
- Australian Social Issues Research 1991. Report on the national
campaign against drug abuse. Sydney: Social Issues Household Survey
1985-1991. Canberra: AGPS, 1991.
-
Staysafe Committee of NSW 1992. Staysafe 19: Alcohol and other
drugs on NSW roads 1. The problem and countermeasures. Sydney: NSW
Parliament, 1992.
-
Goldfrank LR, Hoffman RS. The cardiovascular effects of cocaine.
Ann Emerg Med 1991; 20: 165-175.
-
Bruce RA. Exercise testing of patients with coronary artery
disease. Principles and normal standards for evaluation. Ann
Clin Res 1971; 3: 323-332.
-
Kalix P. The pharmacology of psychoactive alkaloids from
Ephedra and Catha. J Enthnopharmacol 1991;
32: 201-208.
-
Bruno A, Nolte KB, Chapin J. Stroke associated with ephedrine use.
Neurology 1993; 43: 1313-1316.
-
Gawin FH, Ellinwood EH. Cocaine and other stimulants: actions,
abuse and treatment. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 1173-1182.
-
To LB, Sangster JF, Rampling D, Cammens I. Ephedrine-induced
cardiomyopathy. Med J Aust 1980; 2: 35-36.
-
Menegakis NE, Amstey MS. Case report of myocardial infarction in
labour. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1383-1384.
-
Weiner I, Tilkian AG, Palazzolo M. Coronary artery spasm and
myocardial infarction in a patient with normal coronary arteries:
temporal relationship to pseudo-ephedrine ingestion. Cathet
Cardiovasc Diagn 1990; 20: 51-53.
(Received 27 Feb, accepted 12 June 1997)
|
| Authors' details |
Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA.
Jerome G L Cockings, FFICANZCA, FANZCA, Senior Registrar in
Intensive Care; Michael Brown, MD, FRACP, Consultant
Cardiologist.
Reprints will not be available from the authors. Correspondence: Dr J
G L Cockings, Consultant Intensivist, Princess Alexandra Hospital,
Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, QLD 4102.
E-mail: J.Cockings@mailbox.uq.edu.au
©MJA 1999
Make a
comment
|
Readers may print a single copy for personal use. No further
reproduction or distribution of the articles
should proceed without the permission of the publisher. For
permission, contact the
Australasian Medical Publishing Company.
Journalists are welcome to write news stories based on what they read here, but should acknowledge their source as "an article published on the Internet by The Medical Journal of Australia <http://www.mja.com.au>".
<URL: http://www.mja.com.au/>
© 1999 Medical Journal of Australia.
We appreciate
your comments.
|
|